Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 201 - 220 of 13,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
These two lines of doctrine don't usually talk to each other, but they should—especially now. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
Possibilities along those lines include: Platforms win on must-carry but lose on the notice and appeal rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 The Court was indeed reformed in the 1920s, just not along the lines any of these people proposed. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareAs I explain in my preview, the question in Bissonnette v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
(Though, as everyone knows, the line between permissible and "impermissible" testimony in this regard is definitely a fine one.)The Court of Appeal concludes that the officer's testimony in this case (out of San Diego) is more in the second bucket than the first, so reverses the conviction and remands for a new trial. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Jenny Gesley
New Rules on Beneficial Ownership in the Economic Crime and Transparency Act 2023 The United Kingdom (UK) embraced a pioneering approach to beneficial ownership in 2016 when it introduced the People with Significant Control (PSC) register, the first of its kind in the world. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Anna Bond, Lexology: Professor’s ‘anti-Zionist’ beliefs were protected: on Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022: we noted the case here. [read post]