Search for: "People v. McConnell"
Results 201 - 220
of 394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
” United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:41 pm
Access the complete statement and video from Senator McConnell (click here). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
He credits them (specifically, Michael McConnell) with having changed his mind about a number of important legal issues, in particular, the constitutionality of vouchers (used for religious school tuition), which he came to regard as not unconstitutional or as nonjusticiable—that is, an issue for the legislatures, not the courts, to decide. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
His case, Marbury v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
” In an essay available at SSRN, Michael McConnell considers Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
, Shelby County v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
Humanitarian Law Project . . . (2010); McConnell . . . [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
McConnell, "God is Dead and We have Killed Him! [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
Some critics of Citizens United point out that with this case the Court undid some earlier decisions, most importantly a challenge in 2003 to the so-called McCain-Feingold law (McConnell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) cast the American public as a deranged lover, trapped in a “mad romance … with the civil litigation process. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
However, in the 1983 case of INS v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
In the case of all natural rights, the people understood that the government’s role was to preserve natural rights against interference from private actors and to restrain the exercise of these natural rights in circumstances where the people’s representatives in the legislature had determined that such restraint was for the public good. [read post]
