Search for: "People v. Merchant"
Results 201 - 220
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
Ohio v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
The justice said she was “encouraged by the number of people, especially young people, who are expressing themselves in opposition. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:25 am
In Wooley v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:51 pm
The case, Alasaad v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Which is different than courts in some other jurisdictions.Its reasoning (in part):"Unlike the sales tax law and administration described in several of the cases from other jurisdictions, California law does not obligate a merchant to collect a sales tax from the customer. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 8:36 am
The rags would be sold to rag merchants, who paid the rag and bone man by the weight and quality of the rags they collected. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
John Jay led a boycott against New York merchants who engaged in the slave trade. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
In addition, only 6% of merchants accepted digital payments and 10% of consumers had used a debit card in the year 2015. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
According to the FTC: While 1-800 Contacts prices below traditional ECPs, its price is on average higher than that of other online merchants, often by a substantial amount. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:08 am
Granting summary judgment against his breach of contract claims, a federal district court in Pennsylvania found the company’s rules safeguarding its assets were not put in place for the benefit of employees and its detailed information security policies existed to protect it from harm, not to inure to the employees’ benefit (Enslin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:25 am
” This, the Supreme Court just held this morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
People transferred gold and silver to each other in order to satisfy important obligations as well as to obtain items of more direct and obvious use. [read post]
