Search for: "People v. Nixon"
Results 201 - 220
of 625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
But I continue to believe that the 1968 and 1992 elections, to mention only two especially significant post-World War II elections (and not, for example, the 1912 or 1860 elections), present their own problems inasmuch as the two winners, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, had the demonstrated support of only 43% of the population, and, of course, were faced as well by a “divided” Congress in which at least one house was controlled by the opposition party. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
The message of Koni’s memoir about power of courts to reestablish social contract and guarantee people’s rights and dignity was again untimely. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
" Nixon, 418 U.S. at 693. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
In that ruling, the Court said that Congress lacked the general power to inquire into people’s private lives. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:21 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The types of people appointed to the court have also changed. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
” Sussman v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
” Nixon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
” Nixon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:17 pm
The Supreme Court has already barred the possibility that it could serve as a court of appeals for impeachment in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
., the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and at least five other people, including a lawyer connected to the Russian government who promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Nixon, President of the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
This subsidiary thesis also helps clarify why Republican Presidents from Richard Nixon to George H.W. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
