Search for: "People v. Norred" Results 201 - 220 of 10,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am by CMS
However, neither the respondent nor Kensington applied for a licence in breach of this Act. [read post]
15 May 2012, 10:59 am
 One that neither the appellee nor the trial court seemed to be able to follow. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  Nor did Congress "dial back" "its penalty" to zero, because, again, there wasn't any penalty--merely a tax. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Barry Barnett
The case of In re Lemington Home for the Aged (Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the rubric of special needs, the Court has approved of such practices as suspicionless visual strip searches of people entering the general population of a detention facility, in Florence v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court, in denying the motion, further erred in basing its decision on People v. [read post]