Search for: "People v. North" Results 201 - 220 of 4,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2023, 7:39 am by David Bernstein
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm by Amy Howe
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, in which North Carolina has asked the justices to decide whether a state law that allows employers to sue employees who make undercover video or audio recordings violates the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But the treatment of reasons north and south of the 49th parallel is diametrically opposed. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Recently, plans to build a corn milling plant in North Dakota have caused states governments to consider their role in protecting both state and national security. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by David Bernstein
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Legal scholars and historians unanimously report that free people of color did not serve as jurors, in either the North or South, until 1860. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 7:21 am by Russell Knight
Teachers have arguments with people they are in relationships with. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]