Search for: "People v. Peoples" Results 201 - 220 of 72,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2018, 10:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 Slip Op 00855 This case was an appeal from the Supreme Court, where the defendant was categorized as a Level Two sex offender. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
NY Slip Op. 07041 This is an appeal from a judgment entered on 11-20-14 against the defendant. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 5:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 NY Slip 00005 By order of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, which heard a case against the defendant who is a level 1 sex offender. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:28 am by Dan Ernst
We have an announcement of another fun exhibit at the Yale Law Library:Lawyers have played both fictional and real-life roles in the 80-year history of the comic book industry. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:12 am
But it turns out that Pham, a chiropractor, gets convicted of tricking people into letting them touch them intimately in the guise of treating them. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 5:24 pm
On Friday, September 11, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court peremptorily partially reversed the Court of Appeals’ decision in People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm by Richard L. Duquette
  You can peruse the respondants brief below, wherein they agreed with Wooley on appeal - which should result in a reversal of the conviction.IN THESUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, APPELLATE DIVISIONTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Plaintiff/Respondent,v.ANDREW WOOLLEY, Defendant/Appellant. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Danielle Wild
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday’s disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us – People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to the People v Savinon, 100 NY2d 192, 196 [2003] the missing witness instruction was to allow a jury to make an unfavorable interference based on a party’s failure to call a witness, who would usually support their version of the events. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by Manar Waheed
 The court case on which the fate of these thousands of people rests is Ramos v. [read post]