Search for: "People v. Poland"
Results 201 - 220
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 8:44 am
That case is Douglas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
(para 173) The Judge added that whilst the primary obligation in Article 3 was a negative one, the Court had recognised a positive obligation to protect individuals from ill-treatment and that an obligation may arise even when there is no ill-treatment from the state or from other people. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:38 am
* "Teva Tigers v Astrazeneca Lions - obvious to sustain...? [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:04 am
On the UK-Poland Protocol The second aspect of the judgment, albeit one given short shrift, concerns the UK-Poland Protocol on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
In this article the case of McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm
Despite this acknowledgement, the Panel concludes that courts have become more open to human rights arguments following cases like Targosinski v Poland, which overturned established authority that a district judge cannot refuse to hear evidence at first instance and must conduct a proper enquiry into any Human Rights arguments. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
No. 337-TA-655: TianRui v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
aw Komorowski of Poland in a ceremony held at the Polish Consulate in New York. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
– Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court accepts admin lawsuit lodged by Louis Vuitton against China Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (China Law Insight) Core IP issues in M&A and investment (Part II of II) (China Law Insight) ‘Patent Litigation in China’ The book. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
His suffering and humiliation surpassed that inherent in lawful detention (following Kudla v Poland (2002) 35 E.H.R.R. 11 at [92]) and, in any event, his detention was unlawful from the outset. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
(International Transport Workers’ Federation v Viking Line ABP). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
Poland, no. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The period addressed the dip between a new road opening and ‘people getting used to it’.The Court of Appeal held that:The general purpose of these provisions is, as the 1972 White Paper made clear, to strike a balance between public and private interests. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The period addressed the dip between a new road opening and ‘people getting used to it’.The Court of Appeal held that:The general purpose of these provisions is, as the 1972 White Paper made clear, to strike a balance between public and private interests. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
To do so, would be a huge step forward in safeguarding the rights of intersex people. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(IP Think Tank) Most people touting IP Strategy are selling snake oil – don’t believe them (IP Think Tank) IAM names the world’s leading IP strategists (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands How to ‘verb up’ your brand naming (NameWire) Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken (IPKat) Global – Patents Top NPE counsel Ray Niro attacks new Article One service (IAM) (IPBiz) Global – Copyright Final version of ACTA posted (Michael Geist) Goodbye Cathy:… [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
