Search for: "People v. Price (1989)" Results 201 - 220 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Aurora rejected that offer, and an attorney in Hall’slaw office proposed a sale price of $425,000, which would have meant a loss to thelender of about $340,000.It is undisputed that on June 18, 2009, Aurora recorded a notice of default.The notice of default used this (obviously form) language: “The Beneficiary or itsdesignated agent declares that it has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence tocontact the borrower as required by California Civil Code section 2923.5, or… [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
Introduction[1] I want to acknowledge the traditional owners of this land, the Turrbal people. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Mobil Oil Co., 866 F.2d 1149, 1155 (9th Cir. 1989) (following Associated General Contractors formulation); Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Were all politicians prostitutes of corporate interests, whatever that is, in 1989? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Were all politicians prostitutes of corporate interests, whatever that is, in 1989? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
But, again, you can’t make people watch, listen, or read if they don’t want to. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by James Hamilton
The legislation would require companies that sell products like mortgage-backed securities to keep some "skin in the game" by retaining at least five percent of the credit risk so that, if the investment doesn't pan out, the company that made, packaged and sold the investment would lose out right along with the people they sold it to. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1989) (noting that the precise methodology used in "assessing and computing damages is committed to the sound discretion of the district court"). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
"    The panel cited the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]