Search for: "People v. Rhodes" Results 201 - 220 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
" Plaintiffs' reliance on "findings and conclusions" from non-binding cases is of no moment. see People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Eric
" * Search Engine Land: Rhode Island is getting a disproportionate share of Google's penalty in the illegal pharmaceuticals ads case. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
By 1790 both North Carolina and Rhode Island had ratified the Constitution and the proposed amendments. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:36 am by Tomassi Law Associates
SUNDAY NRL round 14: Canberra Raiders v Brisbane Broncos at Suncorp Stadium, 2pm. [read post]