Search for: "People v. Royale" Results 201 - 220 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am by Cyberleagle
Granted, it would be an independent regulator, similar to Ofcom, not a royal official. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am by INFORRM
A Royal Rumble-esque scrap On the 24th of January, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) announced that it will deploy FRT ‘at locations where intelligence suggests we are most likely to locate serious offenders’. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  The very idea that the fact of Royal status generates a public interest is inconceivable given previous judicial findings that all point in the opposite direction, from Prince Albert v Strange to HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Royal College of Psychiatrists has called on firms such as Facebook and Instagram should to hand over data about who their users are and why they use the sites to reduce suicide among children and young people, psychiatrists have said. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
As to the HMO offence, it was not convinced by the appellant’s evidence about the number of people living at the house, nor by the evidence she produced from officers of the Royal Borough of Greenwich. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 8 January 2020 the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced their intention to take a step back from royal duties in favour of a more private life. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 10:01 am by Preston Lim
Supreme Court Rules That Son of Russian Spies Is a Canadian Citizen In December 2019, the Canadian Supreme Court rendered a judgment in the case of Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The company claims that the awards will be "a true reflection of what fans are listening" to.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes looked back at a busy year for the Enlarged Board of Appeal, examining, amongst others, some of the more controversial cases that 2019 brought, such as Pepper (G 3/19) and Computer simulated inventions (G 1/19).Rose also provided a breakdown of some of the important Board of Appeal cases of 2019, which included highlights such as a new approach from… [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Preston Lim
Canada’s Attorney General Blocks Disclosure of Evidence in National Security Case Last month, Canadian Attorney General David Lametti issued a security certificate in the ongoing case of R. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am by Jan von Hein
The decision is likely to have consequences not only for the appeal against the Court of Appeal’s denial of access to the English courts in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell, but also for the development of a more general duty of care of parent companies towards employees and people living in the vicinity of mines or industrial plants run by subsidiaries. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:06 pm by luiza
(Tag: International Whistleblowers) Additionally, UK whistleblower protections received a boost in a November 27, 2019, Supreme Court decision (Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
Royal Dutch Petroleum (United States), Lafarge (France), Lundi Petroleum (Sweden), and Guus Kouwenhoven (Netherlands). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040 (QB) is a peculiar case on its facts and the judgment is well worth a read. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Having recently qualified as a NY attorney, I have been asked how on earth – and why on earth – the royal couple would consider suing the press. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario[v], professional regulators have been required to take into account and balance competing principles. [read post]