Search for: "People v. Singh" Results 201 - 220 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 6:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
” Even where sentences are imposed upon separate charges or counts, the provisions of Penal Law 60.01 (2)(d) apply to prohibit the imposition of a sentence of probation as to one charge, where a sentence of imprisonment in excess of the limits set forth therein (60 days for a misdemeanor) have been imposed on another charge (see People v Cerilli, 80 NY2d 1016 [1992][sentencing court’s imposition of probation, along with a term of incarceration on a separate charge in… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
 Readers' suggestions, especially from Avidity IP (among whose people he has spotted some friendly names), are most welcome. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In this respect there is a threat of a libel action stifling academic debate, and a similarity to BCA v Singh 2010 EWCA Civ 350, where opinions expressed in a controversy on what was essentially a scientific matter were at issue. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Moses LJ and Singh J) dismissed the application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Clear principles limiting the exercise of this power were established in the case of R v Governor of Durham Prisoner ex parte Haridal Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 (now often referred to as “the Hardial Singh principles”). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am by Marie Louise
(TorrentFreak) MCGIP – Who are MCGIP (and why are they suing for other people’s movies?) [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm by The Legal Blog
Chauhan and Justice Swatanter Kumar of the Supreme Court of India, in Vishram Singh Raghubanshi v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | SG v St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin) (17 June 2010) – Read judgment Most people have their first taste of injustice at school. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
The paper cited the case of journalist Simon Singh who spent £200,000 defending himself against the British Chiropractors Association. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
  These people were represented by a lawyer (Randhir Kang) who has since been disbarred from immigration practice in the Ninth Circuit based on unethical and grossly inadequate representation of clients. [read post]