Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 12:16 am
The European Court of Justice ruling last Thursday in Intel v CPM (noted here by the IPKat) has not just attracted a fully-fledged Rapid Response Seminar. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm
Failure to do so is unconstitutional and requires reversal of the conviction (id.).Five days ago, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that the rule of law announced in Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, __ NYS3d __, 2015 NY Slip Op 07565 [Oct. 15, 2015]). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
Enter Tony Moss who called us to task with this comment: Tony Moss said...That's exactly what people like you once said about people like Tommie Smith, John Carlos, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Bill Russell, Muhammad Ali, and others who sacrificed in support of a greater cause than scoring buckets or touchdowns. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
In the recent unreported decision of Smith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:50 am
In Villanueva v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 8:36 am
” Washington v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 am
He said: “If there was the possibility of an interview, we would have needed to be in the appropriate place to do it, which is why we deployed people there. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Fulton v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Nothing much happened until 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm
Yesterday, the Louisiana case Smith v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Many people were surprised by the news, since Smith already is pursuing criminal charges in Florida on the mishandling of classified documents and the likely Jan. 6 allegations are far more tenuous legally. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm
This is old news in interweb time but for most of us old people, news. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm
The case this time is Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 11:23 am
Choose.Different people might say different things, but personally, I'd think that maybe (B) qualifies, but not any of the others. [read post]
