Search for: "People v. Strickland" Results 201 - 220 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the prejudice… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm by cdw
”  [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:33 am by Steve Hall
The briefs were filed in support of a petition of certiorari pending before the Court, Kevin Keith v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am by Jeff Gamso
Some people focus on the silver lining.Justice Stevens' opinion (sorry, Bennett, I prefer the visual aesthetic of omitting that final "s") in Padilla v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
 The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:29 pm by Richard Hornsby
Before I go any further though, a lot of people have asked why Judge Strickland did not rule right away – and here are my thoughts. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court has found ineffective assistance only a handful of times since it raised the bar in a 1984 case, Strickland v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:00 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Melinda Rowe-Sullivan (NIU Law 2003) successfully argued a matter of first impression before the Illinois Appellate Court, Third District, concerning the rescue doctrine.Melinda represented the plaintiffs in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
But the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that incorrect advice on matters that are collateral to the criminal case don't make out a case of ineffective assistance under the Supreme Court's Strickland v. [read post]