Search for: "People v. The Commissioners"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, a second Article 78 action was commenced by the New York State United Teachers [NYSUT], the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 [UFT], the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, New York State Conference [NAACP] and two teachers and a parent [Petitioner Proceeding 2].Supreme Court granted the amended petitions/complaints, vacated the Regulations and enjoined their implementation. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, a second Article 78 action was commenced by the New York State United Teachers [NYSUT], the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 [UFT], the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, New York State Conference [NAACP] and two teachers and a parent [Petitioner Proceeding 2].Supreme Court granted the amended petitions/complaints, vacated the Regulations and enjoined their implementation. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:11 am
Board of County Commissioners, 4 F.3d 848, 853 (10th Cir. 1993), citing Soldal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
But that is a familiar argument; it was a follow-up question of Commissioner Yaki’s that particularly struck me: COMMISSIONER YAKI: Well, let me ask you this. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
[Post by Venkat] US v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
The IPC employed the 2-part test provided by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:27 am
Back in August, the High Court of Australia handed down a ‘decision’ on the patent-eligibility, under the ‘manner of manufacture’ test in Australian law, of claims directed to computer-implemented electronic gaming machine (EGM) technology developed by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
Max Schrems, the man behind a data privacy campaign ‘Europe v Facebook’, claimed that the Commissioner wrongly interpreted and applied the law governing the transfer of personal data from Europe to the US when he rejected Mr Schrems’ complaint. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:00 am
Assuming the FTC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:29 am
See People v Youngs, 122 Mich 292, 293; 81 NW 114 (1899). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:30 am
We have already mentioned the application on 18 February 2011 in the case of Sky Andrew v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:36 pm
C v A Local Authority; G v E, 2010; Neary v Hillingdon, 2011 and see CQC and CSCI’s many reports detailing concerns about restraint). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
She cited reports describing Khan as “abusive” and as a “tyrant,” and the lack of assurance given by the FTC to “put the people first. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
Lucia Cos. v. [read post]
