Search for: "People v. Watt"
Results 201 - 220
of 231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm
Louisa Watts v UK [2010] ECHR 793 (4 May 2010) – Read judgment A 106-year-old woman has lost her challenge in the European Court of Human Rights to the closure of her care home. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:48 am
J.H.H., 22 F.3d 821, 827 (8th Cir. 1994) (citing Watts v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
L.A. has a 224 CPI, because there are some really cheap housing prices in Watts. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:37 am
State, 387 So.2d 477 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)(statutory maximum must be observed when modifying or extending probation); Watts v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
., v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
Watts v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
” This was obnoxious and worthy of contempt, but it was not, under Watts, anything resembling a true threat. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:14 pm
Niagara County Court, New York: People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
It should not surprise anyone that in People v Durand (2009 NY Slip Op 04476 4th Dept 6/5/09) the Court held that under New York law it was error for the lower court to have considered "the counts of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, of which defendant was acquitted, when imposing the sentences on the criminal trespass counts (see People v Reeder, 298 AD2d 468, lv denied 99 NY2d 538; see also People v Rogers, 56 AD3d 1173,… [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:00 pm
In the 1987 case New York v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm
The Court explained that whilea per se (nine-month) bar does not apply, a significantly lengthy period is a factor to be considered, with "proportionally heightened scrutiny" given to whether the People's inability to provide more precise times can be justified as against the important notice rights of the defendant (People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 539; People v Watt, 81 NY2d 772, 775).At trial, the victim testified that the two… [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:22 pm
Watts, 2008 U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:21 pm
Watts, 2008 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
Can you tell me how best one could wake the court's administrative processes up to the needs of the people it is supposed to serve? [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:39 pm
” The ACLU further points out: Mohamed et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:04 am
The message is clear, though: there is a market for people want OS X without paying for Apple hardware. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Watts, No. 07-2462 In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that the defendants' failure to supervise resulted in arrests without probable cause, illegal warrantless searches, and use of excessive force, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to establish that the actions of defendants amounted to supervisory encouragement, condonation or acquiescence, or gross negligence amounting to deliberate indifference. [read post]
