Search for: "Plante v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 2,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Recently, plans to build a corn milling plant in North Dakota have caused states governments to consider their role in protecting both state and national security. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:51 am by John Day
Brown, No. 1076, 564 U.S. ____  (2011) the United States Supreme Court was confronted with the following question:  "Are foreign subsidiaries of a United States parent corporation amenable to suit in state court on claims unrelated to any activity of the subsidiaries in the forum State? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm by ---------------------------------
On February 23, 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, decided the case of In re: Quality Stores, Inc., et al., Debtors; United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court held in Michigan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:39 am
This article considers the interplay between author and nature in United States copyright law, using Kelley v Chicago Park District as a catalyst. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:39 am by Christine Corcos
This article considers the interplay between author and nature in United States copyright law, using Kelley v Chicago Park District as a catalyst. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by West Coast Environmental Law
From across the border, Canadians have been watching the fallout from recent decisions from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by James M. McClammer
  The court’s interpretation of the statute of limitations as applied to the PSD program is consistent with a 2011 district court decision in the 3rd Circuit, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Heidi Meinzer
The United States Supreme Court handily sided with Aldo, ruling unanimously that K9 officers had no such duty to maintain field performance history and records of purported “false positives. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Heidi Meinzer
The United States Supreme Court handily sided with Aldo, ruling unanimously that K9 officers had no duty to maintain field performance history and records of purported “false positives. [read post]