Search for: "Porter v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2018, 4:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The 1974 Supreme Court decision O’Brien v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm by Keith E. Whittington
A panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down a 2-1 decision today in Porter v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
It remains to be seen whether appointed counsel is Arnold & Porter. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Times have more news on the Porter v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), and even the Court’s summary reversal of the Eleventh Circuit on ineffective assistance grounds from earlier this Term, Porter v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
Updating this ILB entry from Thursday on the Supreme Court's 4-1 decision Tuesday in the case of Sophia Willis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm by Thomas Hopson
After law school, she clerked for Judge Donald Porter on the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Michigan Supreme Court should uphold his First Amendment rights [Clark Neily and Jay Schweikert on Cato Institute brief in Michigan v. [read post]