Search for: "Price and Sons v. District Court" Results 201 - 220 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 2:54 am by SHG
Whether one looks to God for the glory of the Union or not, the 9th Circuit decision in Newdow v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Carter Ruml
Image: Wikimedia Commons (public domain) KYEstates is pleased to share welcome news of a taxpayer win in Estate of Black v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911), and in holding that resale price maintenance should be examined pursuant to the rule of reason, the Supreme Court recognized that the number of manufacturers that make use of a given practice in a market may suggest the formulation of a truncated "quick look" rule of reason analysis. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Strevell, a complaint was brought against the Amateur Hockey Association and others by a father on behalf of his minor son, Benjamin Karas. [14]. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
DullumCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Sentencing"The District Court did not err in applying sentence adjustments for loss greater than $30,000, vulnerable victim, abuse of trust, and obstruction of justice, nor in awarding only a one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiralty $2.3 Million Attachment Valid; Prima Facie Claims Stated for New Charter, Discount of Cargo Price Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:16 am
KillmerCitation: 2009 WY 23Docket Number: 06-38Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Dan R. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:56 am
On August 20, 2008 the US District Court in the Eastern District of Tennessee issued an opinion further defining the legal requirements necessary to plead a vertical resale price maintenance cause of action in Spahr v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:13 am
It is subject to approval by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
On habeas corpus, the District Court recommended that Campbell be released without sex offender conditions because he had never before had a "reportable" sexual offense.The majority first examined Coleman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]