Search for: "Prior v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 48,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 4:33 pm
At trial, the prosecutor for the State delivered an opening statement in which she asserted that a witness would testify about an incriminating admission allegedly made by Perkins prior to trial that ... [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:18 pm
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:32 am
A recent California Supreme Court case - People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:51 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in 2005 in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
See Cone v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In Byrd v United States, 584 U. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:36 am
Rick Kittel won in State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court of appeals held last month in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court of appeals held last month in State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
United States, 550 U.S. ___ (2007) (holding attempted burglary a violent felony under ACCA's residual clause), from which he had dissented. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:39 pm
State of Washington (W.D. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:03 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 8:06 pm
Pronova Biopharma Norge v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:06 am
by Dennis Crouch Valve Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
Solvay v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:41 am
"E-Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 12:32 am
10thCir-Denver.jpg In a trial involving aggravated sexual abuse of a minor in Indian country, evidence of the defendant’s prior child molestation convictions, over 20 to 40 years earlier, was admissible under FRE 414 despite the lapse of time between the prior offenses and the current charged conduct because the strong similarity of the incidents made them relevant, in United States v. [read post]
