Search for: "Proper v. Proper" Results 201 - 220 of 32,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2020, 1:33 pm by Steven Boutwell
McLaughlin The Fifth Circuit issued an important decision on April 7, 2020, Texas Brine Company, L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Failure to effect proper service of all of the necessary documents as mandated by law is fatal to a court attaining jurisdiction over the state parties in the actionRandolph v Office of The N.Y. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Failure to effect proper service of all of the necessary documents as mandated by law is fatal to a court attaining jurisdiction over the state parties in the actionRandolph v Office of The N.Y. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:14 am by sally
Regina v Irving; Regina v Squires Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Greater efforts were needed to ensure that correct information was available to sentencing judges so that proper effect could be given to the requirement to give credit for half of the number of any days spent by an offender on bail subject to a qualifying curfew condition and an electronic monitoring condition. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Termination of employment recommended as the penalty for failure to follow proper procedure in safeguarding the property of an agency client NYC Human Resources v Townsend, OATH Index #1325/11 A NYC Human Resources Administration client was arrested and Marvin Townsend, a supervising special officer, was assigned to process the arrest. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:42 am
C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459; WLR (D) 4 “There was nothing unreasonable in a simple conditional fee agreement entered into between a claimant and her solicitor when liability had already been admitted by the defendant in the proceedings provided that the parties had made a proper assessment of the inevitably much reduced risk of [...] [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:39 am
Only service of the petition and related papers an individual authorized by the agency head to accept service constitutes proper serviceMatter of Lowney v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 30270(U), February 4, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 108754/07, Judge: Walter B. [read post]