Search for: "Property Damage Appraisers Inc" Results 201 - 220 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Jul. 3, 2009)(Brister) (INSURANCE LAW: appraisal clause in insurance context, hail damage to home of insured property owner) STATE FARM LLOYDS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
The requirements of open and notorious are codified by the Florida statutes §95.16 and §95.18 where the "in your face" and "neighbors knew his place" are met by recording the title ( §95.16) or by returning a property description to the county property appraiser and paying taxes on the property ( §95.18) and by the substantial enclosure and cultivation or improvement requirements. [read post]
Jun. 26, 2009)(O'Neill) (admissibility of expert testimony, methods of appraising value of condemned property, here billboard easement)(exclusion of expert witness testimony was erroneous and harmful, judgment reversed) THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
  If a fire occurs and the landlord recovers property damage under the fire insurance policy, neither the insurer nor the landlord can sue the tenant for damages. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
Central Bank also received a letter "from the senior underwriter for the 1986 bonds," which, "noted that property values were declining in Colorado Springs and that Central Bank was operating on an appraisal over 16 months old. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
 Here, both the defendant’s appraiser and the plaintiff’s appraiser found that the market value had been “massively diminished” due to the wetlands. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
 Here, both the defendant’s appraiser and the plaintiff’s appraiser found that the market value had been “massively diminished” due to the wetlands. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:59 am
Case Name: Elk Horn Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
We affirm. * * * We find the designated facts to establish that three months after the testator's death, Drake was given the opportunity to purchase the Property for a specific appraised value. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 10:07 pm
" Two couples, Thomas and Barbara Reilly and Edward and Karen Krall, each jointly owned half the stock in Canterbury Village Inc., a property development that was oversold in what was later described as a Ponzi scheme that bilked thousands of investors. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
" Alimony: Payment of support from one party to another; may include property division and attorney fees. [read post]