Search for: "Protect Our Defenders et al v. Defense et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
See People v Swint, 225 Mich App 353, 362; 572 NW2d 666 (1997) (upholding MCL 750.224f’s ban on gun possession by felons be¬cause it “[a]rguably” “does not completely foreclose defendant’s consti¬tution¬al right to bear ‘arms,’ i.e., nonfirearm weapons, in defense of himself”). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
Of Univ. of Ill. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See, e.g., Ronald Randall et al., Racial Representativeness of Juries: An Analysis of Source List and Administrative Effects on the Jury Pool, 29 Just. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See, e.g., Ronald Randall et al., Racial Representativeness of Juries: An Analysis of Source List and Administrative Effects on the Jury Pool, 29 Just. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 9:10 pm
Conant v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:01 am
In Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A., et al. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:14 pm
Steinhaufel, et al., No. 0:14-cv-00203 (D. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
Chigbo Peter Umeh, et. al. , Case No. 09 cr 00524. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Joining Al-Bihani v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:25 am
It is styled, Hector Chapa, et al v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
These defense-friendly case decisions have shielded D&O insurers from potentially hefty jury verdicts and damages – to date. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
These defense-friendly case decisions have shielded D&O insurers from potentially hefty jury verdicts and damages – to date. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
In Coster v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:50 am
Note: For those lawyers among our readers, the District Court decision is Justin Goldman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 11:23 am
Marine Mammal Protection Act Incidental Take Authorization from NMFS; and 12. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
In a recent case, Mastec North America, Inc. et al., v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
At the FTC, for example, Second Requests have been staffed with only one lawyer and one economist (while a typical Second Request would usually have much larger teams of lawyers and economists), and the FTC has begun asking attorneys from its Consumer Protection and Policy Planning offices to review mergers (frequently a new role for these lawyers).11 The agencies have also been pressing parties for more stringent requirements during the merger review. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of the United States Brief in opposition of respondents Thompson et al. [read post]
