Search for: "Public Defender of the State of Delaware"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
On March 21, 2022, the SEC issued for public comment a new climate-related rule proposal [1] that, if adopted, would require registrants to provide certain climate-related information in their registration statements and annual reports filed with the SEC. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Our analysis may be a useful guide – for criminal investigators, press, potential whistleblowers or witnesses, the public and other stakeholders. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
And almost nothing else seems to have brought most the world (and the US public) together more so than defending Ukraine. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:18 pm
As part of the rollout of the Digital Transformation, the bank made numerous public state statements touting the company’s cybersecurity approach and procedures. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
New Hampshire was one of three states where voters went to the polls, marking the end of this year’s nominating process, along with Rhode Island and Delaware. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Ideally, it would generate a brutally candid conversation—presumably, unlike the Philadelphia convention in 1787, open to the public through C-SPAN and other streaming services—about the adequacy of the Constitution to the American republic in the 21st century. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 2:13 pm
Godiva argued that Delaware law applied. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
The vast majority of people that go through the state criminal court system — as many as 90% — are represented by public defenders, many of whom are under-resourced and overburdened. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Chiappinelli’s article How Delaware’s Corporate Law Monopoly Was Nearly Destroyed, was cited in the following article: Kiran Nasir Gore, Delaware as a Next Generation Hub for International Arbitration Practice: Building the Case for the First State, Beaumontm Flouchard & Brodlija, International Commercial Arbitration: Quo Vadis? [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
To restore victims’ access to courts, New York, Delaware, and California have recently created new civil actions for public nuisance designed to trigger the predicate exception, and New Jersey is contemplating [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 11:21 am
This new Delaware state court lawsuit will be interesting to watch, as it may suggest a different procedural path for plaintiffs’ lawyers to follow in seeking to pursue SPAC-related claims. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm
(hereinafter “Wendy’s or Defendant”) is a Delaware Corporation, with its principal place of business located at One Dave Thomas Blvd, Dublin, OH 43017, that owns, operates, or franchises a restaurant located at 2333 28th St. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 7:51 am
The defendants had asserted investigative privilege, arguing that SEC investigations are non-public and confidential.The court said there is little Delaware authority on investigative privilege and was skeptical of the defendants’ ability to assert it. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm
" Delaware and Hoboken, NJ sue oil companies, alleging they committed various state-law torts for their role in causing climate change. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:51 pm
From today's opinion of the Delaware Supreme Court in Cousins v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 11:22 am
The Derivative Lawsuit On August 4, 2022, a plaintiff shareholder filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the District of Delaware against Armstrong and certain other company directors and officers, as well as the company itself as nominal defendant. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, since the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
The claims here are public nuisance, failure to warn, and other state causes of action. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
In response to appeals from the U.S. trustee, and the states of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia, the court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize the plan’s nonconsensual release of third-party nondebtors, like the Sacklers, thus leaving the states’ authority to file further actions against the Sacklers intact. [read post]
