Search for: "Putnam v. Putnam"
Results 201 - 220
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
The case, Waples v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
HP; i4i v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:43 pm
At this point the Court will suspend the motorist's license during the pendency of the case if certain requirement under Pringle v Wolf, 88 NY 2d 426 are met. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
Ct. 2783 (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Health insurance coverage for domestic partnersMatter of Putnam/Northern Westchester Bd. of Coop. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:01 am
The leading case is People v Scott, 63 NY2d 518. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
Putnam Assocs., Inc., 173 F.3d 35 (1st Cir .1999); Blackmon v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:32 am
Since Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam and the Bronx are alleasy driving distance from Connecticut or New Jersey this is a more common analysis that needs to be done by the DWI criminal defense attorney. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:35 am
United States v Martinez-Gonzalez, 686 F2d 93. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Burr v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
Moreover, a building permit issued due to a misrepresentation by the applicant or an error by the municipal agency cannot confer rights in contravention of the zoning laws, and is subject to corrective action, even where the results may be harsh (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d at 282; Town of Putnam Val. v Sacramone, 16 AD3d 669, 670; McGannon v Board of Trustees for Vil. of Pomona, 239 AD2d 392, 393; Baris Shoe Co. v Town of… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
Moreover, a building permit issued due to a misrepresentation by the applicant or an error by the municipal agency cannot confer rights in contravention of the zoning laws, and is subject to corrective action, even where the results may be harsh (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d at 282; Town of Putnam Val. v Sacramone, 16 AD3d 669, 670; McGannon v Board of Trustees for Vil. of Pomona, 239 AD2d 392, 393; Baris Shoe Co. v Town of… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Bailey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Vick v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:39 pm
County department’s refusal to implement County's grievance committee’s determination held contrary to the CBA's grievance procedureVaillancourt v Putnam County, 250 A.D.2d 617Grievance procedures typically provide for a series of steps ultimately leading to arbitration. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:07 pm
Clearly, this applicant has learned its lesson from the decision in Animal Welfare Institute v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:44 am
Footnote 11 in Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Cammann v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:49 am
(March 7, 2003), Putnam App. [read post]
