Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice"
Results 201 - 220
of 675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
If the asylum officer makes a positive finding, the claimant gets a full hearing before a Department of Justice immigration judge. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:44 pm
Justice Kagan's opinion for the Court claimed to uphold Auer v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
Mei Ling v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Defendants receive a shorter sentence in exchange for a quick guilty plea, which enabled dockets to swell with illegal reentry prosecutions and allowed U.S. attorney’s offices and courts to process these cases more quickly. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
When the application is presented to a judge, the judge shall immediately notify the chief justice of the supreme court of the State, or the senior associate justice in the event of the chief justice's absence or incapacity or a vacancy in the office, who shall forthwith assign two other circuit judges to sit with the circuit judge in hearing and determining the application. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
When the application is presented to a judge, the judge shall immediately notify the chief justice of the supreme court of the State, or the senior associate justice in the event of the chief justice's absence or incapacity or a vacancy in the office, who shall forthwith assign two other circuit judges to sit with the circuit judge in hearing and determining the application. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Texas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
Or is this a general approach — don't intellectualize, just do something, quick. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
When it came to resolving whether the Trump Administration's decision to add a citizenship question to the Census in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Justice Kagan with opinion in Gundy v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Instead, “quick as the flame from a discharged cannon at night,” Billy’s right arm shoots “out, and Claggart [drops dead] to the deck. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
In the case Maryland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am
It decided that the merits of the case were not a relevant consideration at the stage where the court was determining whether to exercise its jurisdiction, and departed from its previous decisions to the extent that they stood to the contrary. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:20 am
Conway v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:20 am
Conway v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Quarles v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Justice Gorsuch with opinion in Azar v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
The court’s discussion is too thorough for me to do it justice, but two things stand out. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
” I suggested, following Blackman, that Mueller was too quick to apply this exception to the very different obstruction statutes. [read post]
