Search for: "R. Held, et al. v. State, et al."
Results 201 - 220
of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:28 pm
SPRAWLDEF et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
In Alaska Wilderness League, et al., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:00 am
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America, et. al. held that, despite language in the General Contractor's contract allowing setoff for obligations based upon "any other contract or agreement," Miller Act claims are not subject to setoff based on non federal projects. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
California Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
See Kiobel, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:03 pm
., et al., v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
Houston Funding II, Ltd., et al., Case No. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Property & Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford et al., No. 3:10-cv-2068, 2011 WL 1522326 (M.D. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
The case is entitled Opalinski et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
By: Mark Casciari Seyfarth Synopsis: On March 20, 2019, in Frank, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al., 2008 WL 2130436, No. 08 C 416 (N.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:19 pm
DeFazio et al., No. 12 C 491, 2014 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:33 pm
The court held that, "[n]either the California courts nor the California Legislature are permitted to regulate commerce entirely outside the state’s borders." [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:33 pm
The court held that, "[n]either the California courts nor the California Legislature are permitted to regulate commerce entirely outside the state’s borders." [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Yousuf, et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
Weisblat, et al., v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:10 am
By Rob Cohen On Friday, May 3, a Federal District Judge in North Carolina enjoined the Trump Administration’s effort to change the immigration policy on “unlawful presence” as it is applied to foreign students, in Guilford College et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
Et al., 12 NY3d 72Civil Service Employees Association, Inc. [read post]
