Search for: "ROLLE v. USA" Results 201 - 220 of 313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2013, 8:34 am by Joy Waltemath
In what is likely to be viewed as a big win for employers seeking to defend religious discrimination claims, a federal district court in Nebraska granted an employer’s Rule 52 motion for judgment after trial on Phase I of EEOC litigation on behalf of Muslim employees claiming they were denied time for prayers required by their religion (EEOC v JBS USA, LLC, D. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
USA today has noted how social media companies may reach critical mass and become “too big to succeed”. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
United States The libel action by former Sheriff Joe Arpaio against CNN, Rolling Stone and the Huffington Post has been dismissed by a US District Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Wins $2.57 Million Ruling Over 'Wizard of Oz' Merchandise http://t.co/XZojzmsrMs -> Broadcasters have to pay for ephemeral copies: ESA didn't overrule Bishop v Stevens, CBC v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:07 am by Evan George
But it was blocked by the Supreme Court and then rolled back by the Trump administration. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
Lawyered (podcast) and Andrew Cohen for Rolling Stone. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
Because Rightscorp therefore cannot satisfy the notice requirements of Section 512(c)(3)(A), a subpoena cannot be issued under Section 512(h). * BWP Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 20 and 21 July 2022, the Master of the Rolls, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lady Justice King heard The Guardian’s appeal challenging the decision to exclude the press from the September 2021 hearing for the will of Prince Philip, where it was decided it should be sealed for 90 years. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am by Andrew Crocker and Nate Cardozo
In short, we’re open to data suggesting we’re wrong about the substance of the policy, but we’re not going to let Dave Aitel tell us to “slow our roll. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
City of Roswell, 13-975, and M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:09 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Daiohs USA, Inc., supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1304-1305 [proof of common scheduling policy that made taking breaks extremely difficult would show violation]; Dilts v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
She has also served as the Supreme Court correspondent for The Washington Post and USA Today. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
(The deep irony here is that RFRA was held unconstitutional on multiple theories in Boerne v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Tech companies also have the ability to harden their systems to make mass surveillance more difficult, and to roll out features that allow users to easily encrypt their communications so that they are so completely secure that even their service providers can’t read them. [read post]