Search for: "Ramirez v. People" Results 201 - 220 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
To this the Court replied: The refusal to serve food to pedestrians at drive-through windows does not impact blind people differently or in a greater manner than the significant population of non-disabled people who lack access to motor vehicles. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramirez—FCRA case where D allegedly failed to use reasonable care and people were falsely identified as potential terrorists; sought statutory damages, but most Ps were unable to show that the info had been distributed to third parties. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
I've long been interested in the subject (see, e.g., my criticisms of strict scrutiny in my 1996 Freedom of Speech, Permissible Tailoring, and Transcending Strict Scrutiny and in Part II of my A Common-Law Model for Religious Exemptions), and I was therefore especially interested in seeing Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence discussing the matter in today's Ramirez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
” They convinced voters that the death penalty was needed to punish people like “Richard ‘The Night Stalker’ Ramirez [who] kidnapped, raped, tortured and mutilated 14 people and terrorized 11 more including children and senior citizens. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The rule was designed to address concerns that people who were otherwise prohibited from obtaining firearms could readily obtain parts that they could rapidly assemble into firearms. [read post]