Search for: "Ramirez v. People"
Results 201 - 220
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Some people don’t need an excuse to throw a party. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
To this the Court replied: The refusal to serve food to pedestrians at drive-through windows does not impact blind people differently or in a greater manner than the significant population of non-disabled people who lack access to motor vehicles. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:03 am
Business groups applauded the ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
” People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Guatemala and the “Mapiripán Massacre” v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Guatemala and the “Mapiripán Massacre” v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Ramirez—FCRA case where D allegedly failed to use reasonable care and people were falsely identified as potential terrorists; sought statutory damages, but most Ps were unable to show that the info had been distributed to third parties. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
., Kimsey v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:27 pm
I've long been interested in the subject (see, e.g., my criticisms of strict scrutiny in my 1996 Freedom of Speech, Permissible Tailoring, and Transcending Strict Scrutiny and in Part II of my A Common-Law Model for Religious Exemptions), and I was therefore especially interested in seeing Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence discussing the matter in today's Ramirez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 3:33 pm
” – Strauder v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
” They convinced voters that the death penalty was needed to punish people like “Richard ‘The Night Stalker’ Ramirez [who] kidnapped, raped, tortured and mutilated 14 people and terrorized 11 more including children and senior citizens. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 27, 2007US v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:16 pm
—People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:50 pm
” Ramirez v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:50 pm
"] From Griffin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
