Search for: "Ramsey v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Cahn v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
You can spend $130 million a year advertising (Advantage Rent-a-Car v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:51 pm
API v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Hill and Gertz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
(2) Is this speech regulation state action? [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
Ramsey as “the sure foundation of all that is stable and noble in our civilization. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:34 am
(Doyle v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Va. 1999) (granting motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim); Perry v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am
Ramsey: Oral use? [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB)) has been released in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:50 am
Ramsey disputes any connection to eugenics, which may be fair in Herald’s case. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
Individuals tend to fare worse (.65 v. .74 for use, .27 v. .37 for ITU). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
But see ITUs.]Ramsey: focus on regulation of commercial speech and misleadingness. [read post]
