Search for: "Receivables Purchasing Co. v. R & R" Results 201 - 220 of 938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Aybar) purchased a used 2002 Explorer from his cousin Jose Velez (Velez) together with a set of four Goodyear Wrangler tires. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
The process Kaspersky received was crafted in line with the standards outlined by the D. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Last week Fairplay Canada filed an application with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), asking for a new tool to help Canadian creators to combat online theft of their content by illegal piracy websites. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The question of whether, under the somewhat unique facts of this case, Parente acted negligently in preparing the Financial Statement would appear to require, as in most professional malpractice cases, expert testimony. 4 See Gert/er v Sol Masch & Co., 40 AD3d 282 (1st Dept 2007); Tung v Mui, 260 AD2d 294 (1st Dept 1999). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Pros—(i) It allows for innovation to be used at its marginal cost after the buyout; (ii) (maybe) as a condition, the patent holder could be required to disclose relevant research findings; and (iii) the government can purchase essential drugs, with the result that such drugs are available at prices near their cost of production, also putting downward pressure on the prices of the drugs not so purchased.Cons—(i) How to price the prize; (ii) the prize would have to be in an amount… [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Or can they both somehow continue to co-exist? [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
If you are interested in purchasing an annual subscription for $250 please contact us at sales@fastcase.com to be among the first to enjoy this essential Bankruptcy content via the Fastcase legal research system. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am by Robichaud
On December 8, 2017, the Court released two landmark judgments on this subject: R v Marakah[2] and R v Jones.[3] (Full disclosure: I was counsel to the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA), which intervened in both appeals.) [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Co., 37 U.S.P.Q. 156 (Comm'r Pat. 1938) (QUEEN MARY for women's underwear); Ex Parte Summit Brass & Bronze Works, Inc., 59 U.S.P.Q. 22 (Comm'r Pat. 1943)(AGNUS DEI for safes); In re P. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Howey Co., which states that a security is an investment contract in which a person 1) invests their money; 2) in a common enterprise; 3) with an expectation of profits; 4) based on the efforts of the promoter or a third party. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  Administrative actions were taken by the IRS to address these violations: one revenue officer resigned in lieu of termination, one revenue officer received a 10 -day suspension, one contact representative received a 10-day suspension, and one contact representative was admonished. [read post]