Search for: "Redding v. Christian"
Results 201 - 220
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 4:41 pm
If the court behaves like it did in Henry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
In 1999, Judge Robert Pratt of the Southern District of Iowa, a courageous jurist whose brilliant opinion in Gall v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
(YSL), in favor of Christian Louboutin. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In a decision of 5 September 2012, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the red soles used in Christian Louboutin’s shoes were a "distinctive symbol that qualifies for trade mark protection" and therefore a valid and enforceable trademark. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In a decision of 5 September 2012, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the red soles used in Christian Louboutin’s shoes were a "distinctive symbol that qualifies for trade mark protection" and therefore a valid and enforceable trademark. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
The popular Christian Louboutin (CL) shoes’ red sole trademark is readily recognized by the consuming public. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Written by Susan Neuberger Weller In its recent decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
In April last year, Christian Louboutin – famous for his signature and US trade marked red- lacquered soled high end women’s footwear – sued Yves Saint Laurent for trade mark infringement. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:16 pm
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 2ND CIRCUIT was even more dramatic in its timing, waiting until the first day of Fashion Week to finally release its opinion in Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
September 5, 2012, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals came to a decision regarding one of the most closely watched cases in trademark law, Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:32 am
In the case of Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Yves Saint Laurent: Score one for Louboutin http://wp.me/p2tK1d-1S Christian Louboutin wins trademark rights to red soles, as long as they contrast with the rest of the shoe http://on.wsj.com/R8nsZo [read post]
