Search for: "Reeves v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 11:57 pm
Also the case of R v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:13 am
Bryant, United States District Judge Carlton Reeves (pictured below) found Mississippi HB 1523, set to become effective July 1, constitutionally... [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
No. 15-1144), raising the question of whether the standard of proof established by Reeves v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
Reeves, Brookings] Signs of bipartisan agreement that occupational licensing has gone too far [J.D. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:55 pm
See ya next week The post Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #249 appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:58 am
In the recent decision of Friedman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:58 am
In the recent decision of Friedman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am
Robert Loeb and Helen Klein examined the Al Razak v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 5:03 am
In the recent bench ruling entered in Harrison v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 5:03 am
In the recent bench ruling entered in Harrison v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 5:14 pm
Billy York Walker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:37 pm
Reeves stated that he provided affidavits and documentation to demonstrate that the property was converted to its current use prior to the adoption of the 1959 zoning code, and that it had been used in this manner ever since. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am
Robert Chesney provided us with another Apple v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
Reeves v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:49 am
Rich v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:04 am
Although it was positive, it stated that she would not receive a 4% pay raise. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
Although the court affirmed summary judgment as to her pre-termination retaliation claims, Judge Reeves, in a partial dissent, argued that the majority erred when it found no prima facie case of pre-termination retaliation (Wheat v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
State, 271 Ark. 451, 609 S.W.2d 1 (Arkansas Supreme Court 1980); Lunon v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
As the Court tells us in this case, "Reeves prevents courts from imposing a per se rule requiring in all instances that a claimant offer more than a prima facie case and evidence of pretext" (citing Cross v. [read post]