Search for: "Richard v. Richard" Results 201 - 220 of 13,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Richard J. Simmons
For companies doing business in California, it’s important to be aware of the January 18, 2024 California Supreme Court decision in Estrada v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 7:22 am by Just Security
Rosensaft Russia-Ukraine War / Environmental War Crimes No Longer the Silent Victim: How Ukrainian Prosecutors Are Revitalizing Environmental War Crime Law by Richard J. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc (2003): Judge Richard A Posner's Message and Method on Punitive DamagesEllen M Bublick (University of Arizona, USA)15. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:05 am by Terry Hart
The outcome in both cases is extremely significant and provides us with insights into how last year’s Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:29 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Richards) Abbott Diabetes Care Inc and others v Dexcom Inc and others [2023] EWHC 2591 (Ch) (18 Oct 2023)This was a claim by Abbot Daiabetes Care Inc and others ("Abbott") for infringement of European patent (UK)  2549918B1 for Medical device inserters and processes of inserting and using medical devices and a counterclaim by Dexcom Inc [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
Amir Tal and Richard Allen Greene report for CNN. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Some of the "criticism" was simple trolling but I also encountered one thoughtful line of disagreement (from Prof Richard Re on X and also from an excellent lawyer I know via email). [read post]