Search for: "Rita v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2007, 3:48 pm
California and Rita v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:26 pm
Yesterday, Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts, whose sentencing work always merits attention, issued an interesting opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:07 am
" United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:54 am
United States, 127 S. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
Following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:58 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and now Rita v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
" Rita v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
As this Court strongly suggested in Rita v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:07 pm
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 10:39 am
Ct. 2456, 2465, 2468-70 (2007); United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 10:36 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:59 pm
" In a lengthy footnote at the beginning of his opinion, the judge defended that sentence, relying in part upon the Supreme Court's decision June 21 in the case of Rita v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:47 pm
Mahler offers this article on the conflict between the Supreme Court's ruling in Rita v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:12 pm
United States, No. 06-5754, 2007 WL 1772146 (June 21, 2007); United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:02 am
Today the Eleventh Circuit, in an unpublished opinion, affirmed a sentence meted out by Judge Donald Graham in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Hence, Peel argues that his roommate's consent to the search was invalid and that his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution was violated. [read post]
