Search for: "Robert A. Scalia"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
The majority in Bullcoming comprised Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, Scalia, and Thomas. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:55 am
Or maybe Obama will get re-elected and, mid-term, Justice Scalia will take E.J.Dionne's sage advice and resign. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
Roberts says you must look at the intent of the law, not just the technicalities.On the other hand Scalia says we should no longer call the ACA Obamacare. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Answer: I stress in the book that the Roberts Court is still a “young” Court in some ways. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
The counselor had to lead the court through many planning issues after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, as well as, more recently, smoothing new Justice Neil Gorsuch’s arrival at the court. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:30 pm
It isn’t an “ink blot,” as Robert Bork wanted to treat it. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
But, with Justice Kennedy so often acting as the swing vote, and Roberts almost universally siding with his fellow conservative appointees (Scalia, Alito and Thomas), the Chief has never really put his stamp on the Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
“For Legal Conservatives, Six Decades Of Folding, Followed By Sixteen Years To Draw A Full House; On the plus side, we had Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett; On the down side, we had Roberts, Souter, Kennedy, O’Connor, Powell, Blackmun, Burger, Stewart, Whittaker, Brennan, and Warren”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 4:53 am
She presented Justice Scalia with a letter from Chief Justice Roberts congratulating him on reaching the "midpoint" (or some similar term) of his service on the Court. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 8:24 am
The Court broke along predictable lines, with Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Roberts and Thomas in the majority (Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy were in the majority in Central Bank, the opinion that eliminated aiding and abetting liabilty in actions under Rule 10b-5) and Ginsburg, Souter and Stevens (all three in dissent in Central Bank) in dissent in this case. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:10 pm
Consider the case of Justice Scalia. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 1:52 pm
But pining for a liberal Scalia isn’t the way to push the Roberts Court into the future. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:56 am
Roberts's charming manner concealed the rigidity of "a stealth hard-liner," who's now pulling the Court to the far right: Along with Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
(David Bernstein) I was going to write a post suggesting that Roberts’s vote may have come out the other way if Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 4:08 pm
A footnote to a recent post...Roberts: "The reason these words shock is because of the association. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:48 am
I was right that Chief Justice Roberts would write the opinion (I do not believe Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:52 pm
It found that the stop was unconstitutional - based only on an anonymous tip.Chief Justice Roberts (and Justice Scalia) felt the Court should have reviewed the case. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 5:09 pm
We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Justice Ginsburg, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Breyer, and Justice Kagan, and by Justices Scalia and Thomas “in principal part,” wrote for the majority. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice William Rehnquist voted against Lawrence, and to the extent that Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch and Roberts seem to be more in the mold of these justices than of Kennedy and O’Connor, it is not hard to imagine a substantial revision in the court’s gay-rights jurisprudence. [read post]
