Search for: "Robert S. Crawford"
Results 201 - 220
of 628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2012, 1:15 pm
" Now, doesn't that undercut Scalia's criticism of Chief Justice Roberts's decision in the Obamacare case? [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Here's Version 2.0 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Crawford went on to say that discord at the Supreme Court is deep and personal after Chief Justice John Roberts’ surprise decision to side with the liberal justices in upholding a large portion of the president’s health care plan. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:12 pm
After initially siding with the conservatives, Roberts tried to persuade his liberal and conservative colleagues to converge around a result that would avoid a sweeping 5–4 ruling along party lines, according to Crawford. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:18 am
" Here's what Kerr says: If you leak to [journalist Jan] Crawford with the spin that Roberts’ decision was illegitimate, and then the mandate opponents pick up that theme and run with it, perhaps that view will gain some traction in the legal world and will help out another challenge in the future. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
Notwithstanding two of the VC posters, it is not safe to assume that Crawford's stories tell us what Roberts was actually thinking or why he acted as he did; Crawford is always quite careful to make clear that she is conveying what her sources told her, not what Roberts himself said. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:28 pm
It was surprising enough to read Jan Crawford’s article last week detailing how the Chief Justice switched his vote in the health care case, much to the dismay of his Republican colleagues. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:18 pm
Second, Crawford’s sources have more on the origins of the joint dissent. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm
From his center seat, Chief Justice John Roberts begins his oral summary of the Court’s decision in the health care case: “I have the opinion for the Court in . . . . [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
Louis University Colleen Chien colleen_chien Santa Clara Luis Chiesa proflchiesa Pace Andrew Chin chinunc UNC Chester Chuang ChesterChuang Golden Gate Danielle Citron DANIELLECITRON Maryland Robert Clinton robertclinton Arizona State Kim Diana Connolly kimdianaconnoll Buffalo Jorge Contreras contreraslegals American Nathan Cortez nathancortez SMU Brenda Cossman BrendaCossman Toronto Bridget Crawford profbcrawford Pace Susan Crawford scrawford… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
At CBS News, Jan Crawford has an interview about the decision with presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, in which Romney refers to the individual mandate as a tax and discusses the Chief Justice’s opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
In the recent, extraordinary leak about the internal deliberations of the Supreme Court in the healthcare case, Jan Crawford reports (while leaving ambiguous whether this comes from her leakers) that Chief Justice Roberts was worried about the lack of existing doctrinal support in the challengers’ case. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
But note that this version of the Roberts leak is entirely consistent with Jan Crawford’s published story. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Attention continues to focus on the decision in the Affordable Care Act litigation, and particularly on the spate of leaks about the Court’s deliberations, with regard to which Jan Crawford’s initial report for CBS continues to dominate. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
Crawford brings up her own journalistic scoop — that Roberts supposedly "switched his vote. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:48 am
When Crawford asked whether he would nominate a justice like Roberts, now that the chief justice voted to uphold the president’s healthcare law, Romney answered that he “certainly wouldn’t nominate someone who I knew” was going to come out with a decision that I “vehemently disagreed with. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
-Bridget Crawford Feminist Law Professors [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
(Ilya Somin) Amidst all of the leaks and counter-leaks about the process that led to last week’s individual mandate decision, I find it significant that the pro-Roberts counter-leakers do not contest what I think was by far the most damning claim in Jan Crawford’s original story: that Chief Justice John Roberts switched his vote not because he had a change of heart about the constitutionality of the mandate, but out of fear of attacks on his… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm
CBS's Jan Crawford and law professor Paul Campos, writing for Salon provide two competing narratives about Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and other members of the court's conservative wing as the health-care ruling was coming together. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm
Furthermore, the source characterizes claims by Crawford’s sources that “the fact that the joint dissent doesn’t mention [sic] Roberts’ majority . . . [read post]
