Search for: "Rogers v. U. S" Results 201 - 220 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Lee (George Washington University)   Criminal Justice 04: Topics in the Theory of Crime and Punishment Time: Thu, Jun 7 - 8:15am - 10:00am Place: HHV, TBA20 Session Participants: Chair: Kimberly Ferzan (Rutgers University, Camden) The Meaning of Consent *Vera Bergelson (Rutgers University) State Labelling, the European Convention on Human Rights and the Presumption of Innocence *Liz Campbell (U of Aberdeen/U of Maryland) Assessing the Reach of the Presumption of Innocence… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Judge Pillard wrote the opinion; it was joined by Judges Rogers and Wilkins. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
You went to American U in the early Sixties, a turbulent time when organized left-wing student activism was just getting started and students and faculty alike were outraged over the discovery of a secret U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
Rogers, in 1973, the Court summarily affirmed a judgment by a district court declaring facially unconstitutional Missouri's prohibition on abortion, which was virtually identical to Texas's. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
Rogers, in 1973, the Court summarily affirmed a judgment by a district court declaring facially unconstitutional Missouri's prohibition on abortion, which was virtually identical to Texas's. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Ireland In the case of Sunday Newspapers v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by Sunday Newspapers against an order that part of a libel claim brought by individuals responsible for administering the Witness Protection Programme could be heard in private. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Consider Chief Justice Warren’s laconic statement in Loving v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]