Search for: "Rose v. Rose"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
” On April 26, UMG held an earnings call in which it reported that revenues rose 11.5% year over year to $2.71 billion in the first quarter of 2023, largely driven by successful releases from Morgan Wallen, Taylor Swift, and the aforementioned Drake. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:14 am
” In March, the North Dakota Supreme Court blocked the state’s trigger abortion ban that went into effect after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The latter rule of law treats material prepared for a client, such as an entity’s owner, as a “property right,” and a law firm has a “general duty to provide that material . . . upon . . . request absent a substantial showing of good cause to refuse client access” (Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLP, 294 AD2d 190 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
That issue only rose indirectly. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:21 pm
Rose Hugues commented on the decision in T 0758/20 issued by the Board of Appeal which confirmed that ViCo oral proceedings should be considered the "new gold standard".OtherGuestKat Dawid Sierzant reflected on the new rules on preliminary injunctions in IP cases that will come into effect in Poland on 1 July 2023. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:49 am
[1] Campbell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:41 pm
Artigos A efetividade da lei de água: interface Brasil, Angola e Estados Unidos da América Janaína Rigo Santin, Guilherme Rigo Berndsen, Valêncio Manoel 1-28 PDF (English) A criatividade da interpretação: a imaginação nas práticas interpretativas do Direito … [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
Part IV: A real world example, discussing the famous "Christian Burial" case (Brewer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:54 pm
The Atlantic: “Last week, a district court judge in New York ruled on Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
Seed Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
Seed Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
For example, in Campbell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Mentioned during this episode: The book Secession on Trial by Cynthia Nicoletti The book Rehearsal for Reconstruction by Willie Lee Rose [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Marcel Pemsel commented on the recent English High Court decision Interdigital v Lenovo, regarding FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) licensing rates for patents. [read post]
