Search for: "S. R. V." Results 201 - 220 of 124,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2015, 7:42 am by John McFarland
Witness Exxon’s pleas to the Texas Supreme Court to dismiss Lazy Rs claims. [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:44 am
R (Bassetlaw District Council) v Worksop Magistrates’ Court; [2008] WLR (D) 350 “On the determination under s 52 Licensing Act 2003 of an application for review of a premises licence in circumstances involving criminal conduct connected with the licensed premises, consideration must be given to what was necessary to promote the objective of crime prevention, and to the needs of the wider community, and not be limited to guidance and remedial action and… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:41 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (3) [2008] EWHC 2519 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 323 “In the light of the stance taken by the US government that it would reconsider the intelligence relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom if the court were to make the order sought by the claimant, the appropriate course was to stay proceedings until after the outcome of the forthcoming hearing in the US Federal District Court,… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am by sally
Accordingly, disciplinary proceedings which could lead to a teacher being statutorily barred from working with children were determinant of an individual’s right to practice his profession and art 6 was engaged by those proceedings. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:01 am by sally
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39 “A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making determinations of… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am by Ed Arnold, CMS
On 27 and 28 March 2017, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & Another in which it considered whether the order imposing fees in the employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal is indirectly discriminatory and whether it breaches the EU principle of effectiveness. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:10 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 68 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:32 am
R (Gentle and another) v Prime Minister and others [2008] UKHL 20 “Art 2 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provided that "everyone's right to life shall be protected by law", did not place the Government under a duty to members of the armed forces and their families to hold a public inquiry into whether it had obtained adequate legal advice on the lawfulness under international law of… [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:03 am by traceydennis
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 287 “The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government was not entitled to use the discretionary power to revoke regional strategies contained in s 79(6) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 to effect the practical abrogation of the regional strategies as a complete tier of planning policy guidance. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:10 pm by Staff
Through an extensive investigation, we were able to show that she was untruthful, and the Pinal County Attorney’s Office dismissed all charges. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:45 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Attorney’s fees — Computation This case returns following a remand to the Circuit Court for Howard County to determine the amount of a monetary sanctions award against Roger R. [read post]