Search for: "S. R.C. T."
Results 201 - 220
of 520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
Second District Court of Appeals Judge Michael T. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:36 am
Clearly, that didn’t happen here. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:25 am
"It would have been a duplicative and burdensome paperwork exercise for producers and clearly was an effort to undermine court decisions that said producers who don't discharge into waterways don't need a CWA permit. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
However, neither the judge nor Martin’s lawyer raised Ohio’s Safe Harbor Law, R.C. 2152.021(F). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:05 am
It concluded that if voter drop off is because voters aren’t voting strictly for partisan reasons, then the non-partisan ballot is working to advance Ohio’s important interest in minimizing partisanship in judicial races. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
Cropper t/a R.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Because R.C. 9.75 was enacted pursuant to Section 34, and does improve employees’ freedom of residency, Cleveland’s home rule challenge fails. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
The Antoons argue that because the qui tam action was filed within one year of the dismissal of their state case, the state claim was preserved by Ohio’s saving statute, R.C. 2305.19(A). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
It’s a 3-3-1 decision. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
Key Precedent R.C. 2907.02(D) (Ohio’s Rape Shield Law)(“Evidence of specific instances of the victim’s sexual activity . . . shall not be admitted . . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
What about R.C. 3319.081, which governs Stewart’s employment—doesn’t that preclude his right to request a public pre-termination hearing, as the appeals court found, asked Chief Justice O’Connor? [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law The R.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
Piazza’s Argument R.C. 2744.09 could not be clearer. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:56 am
Finding R.C. 2903.11(B)(1) to be constitutional, the First District affirmed Batista’s conviction. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
”) R.C. 149.43(C)(2)(c) (Court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees are remedial, not punitive. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
The Eighth District Court of Appeals dismissed Carol Thomasson’s appeal due to a lack of a final appealable order, pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B). [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:27 am
The phrase “[t]he cost of the deposition filed in court and of copies of such deposition for each party shall be paid for by the industrial commission from the surplus fund * * *” is mandatory. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Pro-Pak’s Argument The legislature has made it quite clear that its intent in enacting R.C. 2745.01 was to significantly restrict employer intentional tort litigation. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:46 am
The appellate court affirmed the defendant's conviction finding that the defense counsel should have struck the Canadian juror if he didn't want him to serve. [read post]
