Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 201 - 220 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
The state moved to transfer Aalim to adult court pursuant to R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) and 2152.12 (A)(1)(b). [read post]
12 May 2017, 4:09 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Este último punto es importante; varios estudios han determinado que en más del 50% de las reestructuraciones de deuda durante los últimos cuarenta años ha sido necesario renegociar los términos dentro de un periodo de cinco años. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:10 am by MBettman
Substantial Compliance with R.C. 2117.06(A) Won’t Fly The court found Wilson’s argument that substantial compliance with the statute should be permitted was unpersuasive, holding that no court has the authority to ignore plain and unambiguous statutory language. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Robert L. Mues
Husband claimed that because it occurred during the marriage, the debt shouldn’t be his alone. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:16 am by MBettman
Certified Question “Whether a health care provider’s statements of fault or statements admitting liability made during the course of apologizing or commiserating with a patient or the patient’s family are prohibited from admission of evidence in a civil action under Ohio’s apology statute, R.C. 2317.43. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
The court begins the opinion by explaining that[T]his matter arises out of a series of threats that Klingel made toward police on his Facebook page. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:50 am by MBettman
Vivian’s statements in the ICU didn’t literally fall under the definition of any of the words in the apology statute, but concluded that an apology can include a statement of fault. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am by MBettman
It is undisputed that by failing to announce their purpose, i.e., their intent to execute the search warrant, the Boardman police violated R.C. 2935.12, Ohio’s knock-and-announce rule. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am by MBettman
McGowan was asked by her CTC patients and staff to continue this practice, which she felt constituted insurance fraud in violation of R.C. 2913.47. [read post]