Search for: "SAI v. TRUMP et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Solomon introduced a bill that eventually became the Solomon Amendment [8], mandating, in part, that military recruiters not be denied access to campuses lest the entire university be cut off from funding derived from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, et al. [9],[10]. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Next Door Company, et al. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
However, hope that we can get more consensus by going to empirical claims is probably futile, as Dan Kahan et al have said in many other legal contexts. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
The last week of the year we reserve for the fun stuff, that is to say our top ten best decisions.So let’s take the plunge – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
” I suspect that reform may be kicked into the long grass tonight by the Tory rebels et al – not a matter over which I shall lose much sleep given the rather more pressing problems facing the country at the moment which require mature political thought and action. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
The Circuit Court also held that the general grant of jurisdiction in Section 1331 does not trump "the Little Tucker Act's specific and limited grant of jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
How could the EU say ‘no’ to such charming courtship. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
[ii] (I leave aside for now whether that obligation is one that necessarily trumps all other reasons to do or not do X. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
See Ariel Katz’s “game theory” analysis in his blog.I have been provided with a copy of a very interesting and widely distributed email dated April 16, 2012 (the date the agreement was announced) that was sent to presidents of Canadian universities et al by Paul Davidson, President of AUCC. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan who would gladly have bankrupted the New York Times in a trumped-up defamation suit. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
(The Trump administration sought a form of cost-cost regulatory budget analysis in EO 13,771, which President Biden rescinded on his first day.[3]) Biden has now moved to reinvigorate and “modernize” presidential regulatory review via OIRA, using improved BCA. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
Greenberg et al., 965 A.2d 763 (Del. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
The American and Chinese approaches to online platform governance are seemingly vastly different. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
