Search for: "SMITH v. HALL"
Results 201 - 220
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
Al enviársele un disco duro externo vía Federal Express por Douglas Carson, representante legal del Departamento de la Policía de Fort Smith, este sospechó pues normalmente los demandados entregaban la evidencia solicitada vía correo electrónico o correo federal regular. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
New inductees to the IP Hall of Fame 2015Merpel announces the names of this year's five inductees to the IP Hall of Fame, with one big, big surprise that makes this weblog really, truly proud. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
Ten months on from the 13 May 2014 ruling of the Grand Chamber of the European Court in Case C131-12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Google has received 234, 384 requests for removal of links and evaluated 850, 385 URLs. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
Also of note is House Bill 173, an omnibus criminal law bill that would amend the death penalty statutes in light of Hall v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
As Colt “Snake Guns” began to cross the block, the auction hall began to buzz. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
The Court did not follow the case of Hall v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
Guthrie v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:51 pm
As a landlord or letting agent you probably thought: That landlords are not liable to keep in repair external areas such as gardens, communal halls and pathways, and that The landlords are not liable until they have been notified of any repair issues by the tenant However a new Court of Appeal decision, Edwards v Kumarasamy , now says that these views are wrong. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
This case provides some much-needed guidance on that principle.The case is Smith v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
We had posts about this decision from Gabrielle Guillemin and Graham Smith. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
"Mr McKenzie sold Kilmarnock-based Mackenzie Hall Holdings Ltd in 2012 to Virginia-based Portfiolio Recovery Assets for $51 million (£33.5m). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am
” Because this principle, if taken to its logical endpoint, would erode nearly all privacy protections, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
”’ Hall v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Smith, and M. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
Smith (the “claimant”) was cleaning dorm rooms at Perry Hall for his employer’s Housing Department. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Friederwitzer v Friedewitzer and Matter of Francois v Hall held that an award of custody must be based upon the best interests of the child, and there is no prima facie right to the custody of the child in either parent. [read post]
