Search for: "SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA"
Results 201 - 220
of 935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm
In support of its argument, the Bar cites to the Courts decision in Florida Bar v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
There you have it, New York and Florida welcome the Garden State and Missouri closes its doors. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
State, 807 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
State, 807 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:34 pm
Smith, 565 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Zurline v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:25 pm
It was held in Matter of Smith v Devane that SORA indisputably requires persons convicted of certain sex offenses in other jurisdictions to register as sex offenders when they move to New York. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Smith [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
Smith and his supervisor, Lieutenant V. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 11:21 pm
Smith, 2007 U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 5:06 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Hawkins, 686 A.2d 567, 578 (D.C. 1996).Florida: E.R. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 7:00 pm
Wendt v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
Lightbourne later learned that the case in which the Dyehouse memorandum was attached to a pleading was Florida v. [read post]
IN: Failure to file affidavit before search warrant is executed in violation of statute voids search
2 Mar 2007, 5:02 am
" See, e.g., Florida v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:56 pm
With respect to jurisdictional allegations, Plaintiff’s complaint only stated that the terms of the subcontract defined the proper jurisdiction to be the State Court in Dade County, Florida. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-7096 Issues: (1) Whether the “touches or strikes” language in the Florida battery statutes is divisible under Descamps v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:53 am
Dickens v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 12:01 pm
" Order ¶29 (quoting Smith v. [read post]
