Search for: "SMITH v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al" Results 201 - 220 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm by Drew Falkenstein
See e.g., Wickard, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) (the production and consumption of home-grown wheat); Katzenbach v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am by Charles Kotuby
The second pending case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
Martinez, et al. (08-1371). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm
SunTrust Bank, et al (2D08-1239), the Second District granted a petition for certiorari and reversed a trial court order that required the petitioners submit to DNA testing. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
ROOTS The Legality of an American Slavery Introduction February 1 is known as National Freedom Day in the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am by Brannon Denning
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
 Part III stresses that under current U.S. law directors should have a duty to hedge. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
It should be circumscribed by the limits established by U.S. case law on the duty of care, and as such, should be seen as a subcategory of the latter. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
O’Brien, et al. (08-1569), asking whether, when Congress has imposed a mandatory minimum  sentence for using a specific kind of gun during a violent or drug crimes, the jury or the judge is to make the finding on the type of gun. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 7:10 am
Tasini, et al. (533 U.S. 483), on June 25, 2001. [read post]