Search for: "STARR v. PAGE"
Results 201 - 214
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 10:53 am
Justia page. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Civil Practice (Thomson/West 2008) Business Litigation, § 27:28; 1 Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Ian Starr (Ashurst) lived up to his name by sending this link to an explanatory note on the UK's IPO website [nb after posting this item, the Kat checked his emails and found that Graeme Murray had also kindly sent him this]: "French Republic v DHL Express France [Now that's a surprise -- the referred case appears to have changed its name]Chronopost are the proprietors of French and Community trade marks "Webshipping" both of which were applied for in 2000.… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
The briefs in this case can be found at the SCOTUSWiki page here. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
The briefs in this case can be found at the SCOTUSWiki page here. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: England and Wales High Court holds employee-inventor entitled to ‘fair share’ compensation: Kelly and Chui v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP Spotlight) (Out-Law) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO roundtable on deferred examination – reports and analysis (Inventive Step) (Patent… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:46 pm
The sentencing judge in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
Special Counsel Lee Strauss claims that Loumiet purposely got rid of the fax's cover page to make the transactions look separate in reports for Hamilton auditors. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
About lawyers in the Yellow Pages. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 12:10 pm
Fraser, and Hazelwood v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
" Hopefully the Supreme Court's Morse v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
The Supreme Court jump started this issue in January through its work in Hill v. [read post]
