Search for: "STATE OF ALABAMA v. HOLDER"
Results 201 - 220
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
Holder. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:13 am
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Holder, 10-920, and Gor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Holder, 10-694, which had been relisted once, and is likely now holding Johnson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 5:16 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Holder, 10-545 (which had been relisted twice). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
Bank v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Holder Docket: 10-545 Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:13 am
The Court also cited to a 2002 Alabama Supreme Court case, Leonard v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
They didn’t think women should vote.A lot of what the original Constitution was about was constraining the power of the states to pass laws beneficial to debtor farmers in a time of economic distress and expanding the power of the national government to that it could efficiently raise taxes in order to pay off government bond holders, who often were merely speculators in such debt rather than initial suppliers of credit. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 12:02 am
Holvenstot v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– Larry O’Dell, CBS2 Chicago, July 26, 2010 A federal appeals court on Monday reversed a judge’s ruling requiring prompt installation of upgraded emission controls at three coal-fired power plants in Tennessee and one in Alabama. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
Alabama, 308 U.S. 415 (1965). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
United States, Holland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
Alabama Department of Revenue (09-520), limited to the question as posed by the Solicitor General in the United States’ amicus brief Cullen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Title: Arar v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
JANUARY SITTING: Alabama v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
