Search for: "STATE v BECKER" Results 201 - 220 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Scott Hervey
   Three academic publishers filed suit against Georgia State University claiming that the University infringed their copyrights by maintaining a policy which allows GSU professors to make digital copies of excerpts of their books available to students without paying them a royalty. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:26 am by Epstein Becker Green
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kate Heffernan, Marylana Helou, and Megan Robertson discuss how the changing state laws and regulations post-Dobbs may impact clinical research in different ways for different stakeholders [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
That was so even though it was common practice in the beauty products sector to market products either under a combination of surnames and first names or alternatively under one or the other.The decision in Case C-51/09 Becker v Harman International Industries (BARBARA BECKER v BECKER) could apply by analogy to this controversy in order to conclude that a likelihood of confusion does not automatically exist 'when the earlier mark consists of a… [read post]