Search for: "STATE v COLORES" Results 201 - 220 of 6,340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
When public officials block commenters from their social media pages, are they acting “under color of” state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
United States—have now come to recognize the danger that laws like SB8 and SAPA pose.If so, perhaps the explanation can be found in the fact that SAPA reveals the true colors of state legislators who seek to evade federal judicial review. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
”[4] The current ontologies of the human-A.I. relationship does not move far from this starting (and end) point.[5]   In Alice Walker’s book, The Color Purple,[6] one gets a taste for this in the relationship between Sofia and her ‘mistress’, Miss Millie, who Sofia detests, but who treats her as a human extension of herself—an adult and animated version of the dolls she played with as a child. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
Under the statute, one couldn't use such photographs at all unless one fell into various exceptions—these included exceptions for educational or newsworthy purposes—and even then there were some restrictions related to the size and color of the photo one could use. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:36 am by Kenan Farrell
The plaintiff filed its response on October 10, 2023, advising that, having served the Georgia Secretary of State, it would soon be filing a new entry of default. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:12 am by jonathanturley
This year, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
As the Court stated: “We have time and again forcefully rejected the notion that government actors may intentionally allocate preferences to those ‘who may have little in common with one another but the color of their skin” (quoting Shaw v. [read post]